/
How does fire affect mass timber materials? Part 1
How does fire affect mass timber materials?

Part 1

No structural material is left unchanged by fire – steel, concrete, and wood all have different strengths and weakness in the event of a structural fire. However, wood is fundamentally different from the others because it not only changes, it burns.

Fire in Wood

When wood burns, it chars from the outside in at a generally predictable rate [1]. The surface of the piece is the only area where all three corners of the fire triangle are available – fuel, heat, and crucially, oxygen. Underneath the charred layer, toward the core of the component, there is a slightly cooler layer where the wood is undergoing pyrolysis, or thermal decay in the absence of oxygen. In this zone, the wood is losing some of its strength but it is not yet burning. At the core, beyond the heated zones, is unaffected wood.

The edge of the charred layer will continue to move inward toward the center of the piece, for as long as the fire is heating it, but the rate it moves inward slows over time because the char that already exists acts as a growing layer of insulation [1]. The size of a piece of wood greatly impacts how long this process takes. It’s easy to picture this effect by thinking of a campfire: a small stick of kindling burns quickly compared to the log that burns slowly all night.

Once wood is charred, it loses essentially all of its strength, so the overall load carrying capacity of a wooden structural element depends on its uncharred component [2]. In a small timber, such as regular dimension lumber, the piece will char through and lose its structural capacity relatively quickly. A larger piece of wood takes exponentially longer to char through, so the piece will retain its structure for much longer. The size of the elements is key to the fire behavior of mass timber. 

Compared to Fire in Mass Timber

Testing has shown that mass timber typically has a similar charring rate to solid wood [1] However, any gap in the material that allows oxygen further in can increase the depth of the charred layer and affect the wood structure and behavior of the fire, as can contact with metal elements or connections that conduct heat [3]. Connection performance and strength can also be impacted by the heat, even if they are not directly exposed [6, 7].

Not all mass timber behaves quite the same, either. Delamination at the adhesive layer is a particular concern, especially in dimension lumber-based composites like CLT where each lam represents a significant proportion of the total cross section. Layers may delaminate if the char fully penetrates them, depending on how well the adhesive used in the panel withstands heat, and how well the wood and adhesive have bonded. If a delamination does occur, it has the twofold effect of adding fuel to the fire and revealing unburned surface for further charring, both of which can extend the fire’s timeline.

Delamination is a well-established challenge and an active area of research. It is well established that some adhesives perform better than others in elevated temperatures, but these effects are tempered by many factors, including the structural loading in place during the heating, the time-temperature profiles, and ambient moisture content, among others [6–8].

Approaches to Mitigation

Approaches that can help mitigate the direct effects of fire on mass timber in service can be applied at multiple scales. Mass timber materials governed by the PRG 320 are now required to utilize heat resistant adhesives, which reduces the vulnerability of the material itself [9]. The mass timber elements in buildings can be upsized to account for the loss of strength to charring, and they can be covered by non-combustible barriers and/or intumescent coatings. Spaces can be designed in ways that can improve the likelihood that fires will self-extinguish [1,2,6,10,11].  Though quite a bit of work is being done on all of these fronts, more research is needed.

Research at Home (aka OSU’s Campus)

The effect of fire on the materials used in a building is important to know, so that they can account for those effects in the design of the building.  Researchers continue to look at how mass timber systems behave in fire, in order to provide engineers, designers, and architects with the tools to build safe structures that still have the benefits of mass timber. 

The upcoming Oregon Fire Testing Facility on the OSU campus will enable researchers close to home to continue investigating many of these critical questions. There is only one other fire testing facility on the Pacific Coast, and no other university-run laboratories west of Michigan. The opening of the fire testing lab will be a huge boon to researchers throughout the western US.

The next post in the fire series will discuss how the behavior of fire and fire testing in wood materials is translated to fire design research and mitigation strategies at the structural scale.

References

[1]          D. Barber, R. Gerard, Summary of the fire protection foundation report – fire safety challenges of tall wood buildings, Fire Sci. Rev. 4 (2015) 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40038-015-0009-3.
[2]          J. Liu, E.C. Fischer, A.R. Barbosa, A. Sinha, Experimental Testing and Numerical Simulation of Timber-Concrete Composite Floors in Fire, J. Struct. Eng. 149 (2023) 04023151. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12577.
[3]          E.C. Fischer, S. Bhandari, A. Sinha, Fire Testing of Glue-Laminated Beam-to-Column Connections, J. Struct. Eng. 151 (2025) 04025020. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13888.
[4]          K. Mahr, A. Sinha, A.R. Barbosa, Elevated Temperature Effects on Performance of a Cross-Laminated Timber Floor-to-Wall Bracket Connections, J. Struct. Eng. 146 (2020) 04020173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002737.
[5]          K. Mahr, A. Sinha, A.R. Barbosa, Experimental Investigation and Modeling of Thermal Effects on a Typical Cross-Laminated Timber Bracket Shear Connection, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (2020) 04020111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003122.
[6]          L. Muszyński, R. Gupta, S. hyun Hong, N. Osborn, B. Pickett, Fire resistance of unprotected cross-laminated timber (CLT) floor assemblies produced in the USA, Fire Saf. J. 107 (2019) 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2018.12.008.
[7]          M. Cheung, A. Zaben, C. Maluk, Experimental method for studying the effects of elevated temperature in adhesives used in laminated Mass Timber, Fire Saf. J. 146 (2024) 104058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.104058.
[8]          A. Čolić, F. Wiesner, M. Spearpoint, D. Hopkin, L. Bisby, Influence of Adhesive Type on Heat Induced Delamination in Tension Loaded Shear Lap Cross‐Laminated Timber Samples Exposed to Radiant Heat Flux, Fire Mater. (2026) fam.70041. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.70041.
[9]          Standard for Performance-Rated Cross-Laminated Timber, (2025). https://www.apawood.org/guides-tools-training/technical-document-library/standards/ansiapa-prg-320-2025-standard-for-performance-rated-cross-laminated-timber/.
[10]       J. Liu, E.C. Fischer, Review of large-scale CLT compartment fire tests, Constr. Build. Mater. 318 (2022) 126099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126099.
[11]       F. Wiesner, H. Xu, D. Lange, V. Gupta, I. Pope, J.L. Torero, J.P. Hidalgo, Large-scale compartment fires to develop a self-extinction design framework for mass timber-Part 2: Results, analysis and design implications, Fire Saf. J. 152 (2025) 104346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104346.