/
How has mass timber been tested for seismic performance? Part 2
How has mass timber been tested for seismic performance?

Part 2

The previous post described some earlier large-scale seismic testing programs in mass timber. Somewhere along that timeline, engineers became increasingly interested in a more nuanced approach to preparing structures for disturbances: the concept of resilient design. Structures built to the highest seismic standards aim to be resilient, able to handle the impact of an event, adapt to any changes, and recover from them  [1–3].

Resilient Design

Resilient design uses systems that are capable of dissipating external energy and minimizing residual drift without significant structural damage [4]. Damaged buildings become hazards in their own right, left unsafe or unusable after an event, and can require costly and time-consuming repairs. Resilient design that reduces the damage sustained by a structure offers benefits like increased safety for occupants, decreased repair time after an event, decreased repair cost, and sustainability in terms of material longevity [5].

Resilience is now a guiding principle in the ongoing research around the capacity of mass timber structures, particularly in seismically active regions where designing buildings with earthquakes and similar events in mind is critical [6]. Mass timber is very light for its strength, and that fact combined with its inherent tensile strength can be used to good effect [7]. Researchers are continually developing new methods to improve how buildings handle the motion and energy induced by earthquakes by finetuning both the gravity and lateral systems to include repairable and self-centering elements.

Recent Seismic Tests

Since 2017, starting with 2-story shake table test discussed in the last post, an exciting wave of tests have opened up the possibilities in mass timber structures. The earlier tests and the breadth of previous testing on innovative connections and components assemblies helped set the stage for some of the larger scale initiatives that we’ve seen in recent years.

In 2021 – 2022, TDI’s very own Emmerson Laboratory opened with a strong showing in the form of the Emmerson Laboratory Launch Initiative – a project that saw a three-story mass timber structure built inside of Emmerson and subjected to several of the very-slow-earthquake style tests. The structure used primarily Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) mass plywood panels and laminated veneer lumber columns and beams. It was a novel design for a few reasons: It was the first test of mass plywood panel-based self-centering rocking walls, and it was the first the connect the repairable elements (in this case, U-shaped flexural plates) from wall panels to boundary columns instead of between wall panels [8]. It also featured phases testing rocking walls paired with buckling restrained braces, and veneer laminated timber walls with various connections [9,10].

This project utilized lateral quasi-static loading tests, where the loading is done in stages to allow the elements to regain equilibrium in-between movements. Ultimately, the researchers pushed the building out to a maximum roof drift ratio of 4%, doubling the displacement required by many design standards.

In 2023, the second round of shake table tests under the NHERI Tallwood umbrella were groundbreaking. Researchers built, and shook, a 10-story, 34m tall building – the tallest structure ever tested on a multi-directional shake table.

Both the gravity systems and lateral force resisting systems were designed to be resilient and included repairable elements. The specimen included CLT and MPP post-tensioned shear rocking walls, floors made out of CLT, VLT, nail & dowel laminated timber with plywood sheathing (NLT/ DLT), and glue laminated timber with plywood sheathing (GLT). It also included some non-structural finishing such as staircases and a partial façade. The building underwent 88 separate simulated earthquakes. At the end, the structure was still centered and had taken minimal damage, which reinforced the capabilities of this type of design [11].

Of course, the tests did not stop there. The NHERI Converging Design program, Tallwood’s successor, featured an ambitious program including both shake table testing at the same facility and a series of analyses on how mass timber can be deconstructed and reused [12]. In fact, most of the shake table specimen itself was reused – it was the first 6 stories of Tallwood’s 10-story building, repaired and reconfigured.  

Courtesy of A. Sinha, B. Simpson, A. Barbosa

This time, in 2023-2024, the researchers looked more closely at the energy dissipating elements of the lateral systems [13–15]. Specifically, they tested:

  1. Post-tensioned MPP and CLT walls with U-shaped flexural plates,
  2. Post-tensioned MPP and CLT walls with buckling restrained braces, and
  3. A resilient steel brace frame structure.

The researchers found that two of these systems worked as intended, minimizing damage and residual drift in the structure [16,17]. Results from the final system are still being analyzed but seem promising.

Other types of mass timber structures have also been investigated. Just one example was in 2024, when the Composite Recycling Technology Center, alongside Washington State University and the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center put a rapid deployment shelter prototype made of thermally modified coastal Western Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) through its paces on a triaxial shake table in Illinois [18]. This test was an interesting case using a species that is often considered underutilized.

Earthquakes are complex movements, and the loads that they put on buildings can be devastating. Action toward building seismically resilient structures is critical for protecting both lives and infrastructure, but before action can be taken, the data needs to be there. These tests, and others by researchers around the world, have provided strong evidence that mass timber can hold its own in the arena of resilient design.

References

[1]           M. Bruneau, A. Reinhorn, Exploring the Concept of Seismic Resilience for Acute Care Facilities, Earthquake Spectra 23 (2007) 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2431396.
[2]           M.D. Joyner, C. Gardner, B. Puentes, M. Sasani, Resilience-Based seismic design of buildings through multiobjective optimization, Engineering Structures 246 (2021) 113024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113024.
[3]           M.H. Kurth, J.M. Keenan, M. Sasani, I. Linkov, Defining resilience for the US building industry, Building Research & Information 47 (2019) 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1452489.
[4]           N.B. Chancellor, M.R. Eatherton, D.A. Roke, T. Akbaş, Self-Centering Seismic Lateral Force Resisting Systems: High Performance Structures for the City of Tomorrow, Buildings 4 (2014) 520–548. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings4030520.
[5]           Y. Zhang, J.F. Fung, D. Cook, K.J. Johnson, S. Sattar, Benefit–Cost Analysis for Earthquake-Resilient Building Design and Retrofit: State of the Art and Future Research Needs, Nat. Hazards Rev. 25 (2024) 03124001. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1910.
[6]           PNW Earthquake Sources Overview, Pacific Northwest Seismic Network (n.d.). https://pnsn.org/outreach/earthquakesources (accessed August 27, 2025).
[7]           Q. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Feng, Y. Zhao, Z. Li, Mechanical properties and probabilistic models of wood and engineered wood products: A review of green construction materials, Case Studies in Construction Materials 21 (2024) e03796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03796.
[8]           P.A. Uarac, T.X. Ho, A.R. Barbosa, B. Simpson, A. Sinha, Design and cyclic testing of a full-scale three-story mass timber structure with post-tensioned self-centering rocking walls, Journal of Building Engineering 115 (2025) 114505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114505.
[9]           G.A. Araújo R., B.G. Simpson, A.R. Barbosa, L. Pieroni, T.X. Ho, G.F. Orozco O, B.T. Miyamoto, A. Sinha, Experimental and Numerical Simulation of a Three-Story Mass Timber Building with a Pivoting Wall and Buckling-Restrained Boundary Elements, Journal of Structural Engineering 151 (2025) 04025089. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13781.
[10]        N.T. Thielsen, Design and Experimental Testing of a Coupled Veneer Laminated Timber Self-Centering Rocking Wall with U-Shaped Flexural Plate Dissipators, Masters, Oregon State University, 2024. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/d217qz885.
[11]        S. Pei, K.L. Ryan, J.W. Berman, J.W. van de Lindt, S. Pryor, D. Huang, S. Wichman, A. Busch, W. Roser, S.L. Wynn, Y. Ji, T. Hutchinson, S. Sorosh, R.B. Zimmerman, J. Dolan, Shake-Table Testing of a Full-Scale 10-Story Resilient Mass Timber Building, Journal of Structural Engineering 150 (2024) 04024183. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13752.
[12]        A.R. Barbosa, NHERI Converging Design: Overview of 6-story shake-table test program, (2024).
[13]        P.A. Uarac, A.R. Barbosa, A. Sinha, J.W. van de Lindt, B.G. Simpson, K. Lotfizadeh, System Identification of a Full-Scale Six-Story Building with Self-centering Rocking Walls with Distributed Energy Dissipation, in: Á. Cunha, E. Caetano (Eds.), Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Engineering Structures, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2025: pp. 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96114-4_64.
[14]        T.J. Field, A.R. Barbosa, A. Sinha, S. Pryor, J.W.V.D. Lindt, B. Simpson, P.A.U. P., P. Mishra, S. Kontra, M. McBain, Full-Scale Shake Table Test of Resilient Six-Story Hybrid Mass Timber and Steel Structure, in: World Conference on Timber Engineering 2025, Brisbane, Australia, 2025: pp. 2473–2480. https://doi.org/10.52202/080513-0301.
[15]        M. McBain, L. Pieroni, G.A.A. R., B.G. Simpson, A.R. Barbosa, J.W.V.D. Lindt, A. Sinha, S. Kontra, P. Mishra, S. Pryor, P.A.U. P., T.J. Field, Response of Mass Ply Panel, Self-Centering Rocking Walls with Buckling Restrained Boundary Elements as Energy Dissipators in Shake Table Testing, in: World Conference on Timber Engineering 2025, Brisbane, Australia, 2025: pp. 2463–2472. https://doi.org/10.52202/080513-0300.
[16]        M. McBain, L. Pieroni, G.A. Araújo Rodríguez, S. Kontra, P. Mishra, A.R. Barbosa, L. Gioiella, J.W. Van De Lindt, A. Sinha, N. Brown, F. Freddi, B.G. Simpson, Design and Shake-Table Testing of a Full-Scale, Six-Story Mass Timber Building with Posttensioned Rocking Walls and Buckling-Restrained Boundary Elements, J. Struct. Eng. 152 (2026) 04026126. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-15854.
[17]        T. Field, A.R. Barbosa, S. Pryor, Simpson, Barbara, P. Uarac, A. Sinha, J.W. Van De Lindt, Shake-Table Testing of a Full-Scale Six-Story Resilient Mass Timber–Steel Hybrid Building, Journal of Structural Engineering 151 (2025) 04025210. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.%20STENG-15036.
[18]        P. Bahmani, Full-Scale Shake Table Testing of a Hybrid CLT/Steel Modular Building, Washington State University, 2026.